Legal Opinion

Lexington Sheet Metal Works v. Libman Contracting Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 7, 1914Published

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of the Bronx, Second District. Action by the Lexington Sheet Metal Works against the Libman Contracting Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed, and complaint dismissed. House, Grossman & Yorhaus, of New York City, for appellant. Julius D. Tobias, of New York City, for respondent.

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

The complaint did not sufficiently allege performance (Code of Civil Procedure, § 533; Rosenthal v. Rubin, 148 App. Div. 44, 132 N. Y. Supp. 1053, and cases cited), nor did the plaintiff prove performance of the contract according to the terms thereof. Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, without prejudice to. a new action. All concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rosenthal v. RubinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911