Legal Opinion
Howard Opera House Associates v. Urban Outfitters, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 5, 2003No. Docket No. 02-7593PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendant-counter-claimant-appellant Urban Outfitters, Inc. (“Urban Outfitters”) *127appeals from a series of related orders of the district court for the District of Vermont (William K. Sessions III, Judge), culminating in judgment for plaintiffs-counter-defendants-appellees Howard Opera House Associates (“Howard”) and O’Neill, Crawford & Green, P.C. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the judgment in most respects but remand for clarification of the injunctive relief ordered by the district court.
The pertinent facts are as follows: Urban Outfitters is a retail chain targeting purchasers…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Peregrine Myanmar Ltd. And Peregrine Capital Myanmar Ltd. v. Miriam Marshall SegalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Pro-Choice Network v. SchenckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Howard Opera House Associates v. Urban Outfitters, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 2001
3Cited by2 opinions
- GENCO IMPORTING INC. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Howard Opera House Associates v. Urban Outfitters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003