Legal Opinion
State of Minnesota v. Erik John Heinonen
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 30, 2017No. A16-229PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOOTEN, Judge
On appeal from his convictions of possessing a short-barreled shotgun and being a prohibited person in possession of a firearm, appellant argues that the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress statements he made to law enforcement and the DNA sample he provided. We affirm.
FACTS
On June 1, 2015, law enforcement officers executed a search warrant at a residence. The homeowner was the target of the search warrant. After encountering and handcuffing the homeowner at the entry to the house, the officers were charged by a large dog, which they were able to subdue.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- William R. Cody v. Herman Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary Mark Meierhenry, Attorney General, State of South DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- State v. GausterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. HeinonenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018