Legal Opinion

Hinkley v. Greene

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1869PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Chicago; the Hon. John A. Jameson, Judge, presiding. This was a suit in chancery, instituted in the court below by Coggswell K. Greene, against the unknown heirs of Henry Moore, deceased, and various others. The facts are fully presented in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker

It appears that on the 24th of June, 1835, Wm. B. Ogden conveyed to Samuel L. Hinkley and Henry Moore, lots 31 and 32, in Kinzie’s addition to Chicago. The sale was for $5000, one-fourtli was paid in hand, and the balance to be paid in one and two years, in equal installments, with ten per cent interest.

The cash payment was made by Hinkley, and Moore gave to him his note for one-half, but it was never paid. To secure the deferred payments, Hinkley and Moore executed a mortgage to Ogden on the premises, which was duly recorded.

On the 27th of November following, Ogden sold and assigned the bond…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chickering v. FailesIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Goewey v. UrigIllinois Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Laflin v. HerringtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Koester v. EsslingerIllinois Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rawson v. FoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Price v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Foote v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Mason v. AyersIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Burns v. EdwardsIllinois Supreme Court · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API