Atchley v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.
The defendants were jointly indicted and convicted on a charge of unlawfully possessing a still to be used for the manufacture of prohibited liquors. After conviction and judgment there was motion for new trial upon the ground of insufficiency of the evidence.
It may be stated in the beginning that the evidence was sufficient to connect all of the defendants with the possession of the' articles testified to as having been found at the place where the defendants were arrested. Sharp v. State, ante, p. 81, 112 So. 460.
The motion as to all of the defendants presents a different question. Has the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wilson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
- Patrick v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
- Fillmore v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
- Martin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. ConeWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Clay v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929