Legal Opinion

Cocanig v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1961No. 35981PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Solfisburg

The plaintiffs, Geno Cocanig and Mary Cocanig, brought suit to enjoin the city of Chicago from shutting off water to their residence property. The city filed a motion to strike the complaint, which was allowed. The plaintiffs appealed to the First District Appellate Court, which affirmed the judgment. (25 Ill. App. 2d 433.) We granted petition for leave to appeal.

The following facts gave rise to the present action. On or about March 26, 1954, one McNamara purchased a house at 5742 South Sawyer Avenue, Chicago, and executed a mortgage to Lawn Savings and Loan Association. Thereafter Lawn…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. City of Atlanta v. BurtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  3. Rockford Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of RockfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  4. City of Chicago v. MandolineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  5. Cocanig v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marcon v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  2. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API