In re McAneny
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Applications by the petitioners, George McAneny and others, constituting the Transit Commission, pursuant to section 14 of the Public Service Commission Law, chapter 48 of the Consolidated Laws (Laws of 1910, chap. 480), as amended by section 19 of chapter 134 of the Laws of 1921, for orders requiring the board of estimate and apportionment to make certain appropriations for which the Transit Commission had theretofore made requisition.
1Opinion of the Court
Clarke, P. J.:
Chapter 134 of the Laws of 1921 amends chapter 48 of the Consolidated Laws (Laws of 1910, chap. 480), the Public Service Commissions Law.* Section 8 amends section 4 of such chapter, as amended by chapter 263 of the Laws of 1919, and provides that there shall be a Public Service Commission which shall possess the powers and duties thereinafter specified and also all powers necessary or proper to enable it to carry out the purposes of this chapter. The Commission shall consist of five members, to be appointed by the Governor, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Providence Bank v. BillingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- The People v. . Simeon DraperNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- People Ex Rel. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. v. State Board of Tax CommissionersNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- People Ex Rel. Griffin v. Mayor of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re FlemingNew York Supreme Court · 1921
- Holbrook, Cabot & Rollins Corp. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1921
- Continental Guaranty Corp. v. CraigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923