Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schwarz v. Stemme

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 24, 1989No. 54796Published

1DissentGary M. Gaertner, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

Section 473.340(4) (1986) mandates that a court “order the joinder of the personal representative if he is not named as a party.” See also Estate of Pilla, 735 S.W.2d 103, 104 (Mo.App., E.D.1987). Appellants in the case before us named as parties to the action the personal representatives of Walter Bloemker’s estate in their individual capacity. I believe this satisfied the requirements of the statute. For, RSMo § 473.340(4) (1986) does not state that personal representatives must be named in their representative capacity. This court is not permitted to add provisions…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. May Department Stores Co. v. WeinsteinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Wilkinson v. BruneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Beck v. PillaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Crooks v. HolcombMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Simpson v. ShelkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API