Commonwealth v. Cumba

After a jury-waived trial, a judge of the Central Division of the Boston Municipal Court Department found the defendant guilty of being a disorderly person.2 On appeal, the defendant argues that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction and that an in-court identification by the arresting police officer should have been excluded under Commonwealth v. Crayton, 470 Mass. 228 (2014). We affirm.

Discussion. 1. Sufficiency of the evidence of disorderly conduct. "A person is guilty of disorderly conduct if, with purpose to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly…