Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Green

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 13, 1935No. 10467PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In Brown v. Tucker, 47 Ga. 485 (3), it was held: “One who silently stands by and permits another to purchase his property, without disclosing his title, is not guilty of such a fraud as estops him from subsequently setting up such title against a purchaser with notice. Section 2915 of the Code [Code of 1933, § 105-304] only operates in favor of a bona fide purchaser without notice.” See also Patterson v. Esterling, 27 Ga. 205. The doctrine of caveat emptor applies. The burden was upon the petitioner Shaw to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant, Mrs. Green, was estopped.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. TuckerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
  2. Patterson v. EsterlingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bennett v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  2. Pressley v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API