Legal Opinion

Brambir v. Seifert

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 26, 1926PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

We cannot assume that the 1924 amendment of section 1425 of the Civil Practice Act (added by Laws of 1921, chap. 199, as amd. by Laws of 1924, chap. 514), providing for judgment for rent, was intended, contrary to well-established principles, to warrant the entry of judgment for rent against a tenant not personally served with the precept or who had not appeared in the proceeding. .

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs.

All concur; present, Bijur, O’Malley and Levy, JJ.

2Cited by10 opinions

In re McDonaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
Dolan v. LinnenCivil Court of the City of New York · 2003
Avgush v. BerrahuAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2007
In re the Estate of WickingsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
In re WytheCity of New York Municipal Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.