Legal Opinion
Mays v. City of Flint
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided October 6, 2016No. Case No. 16-11519PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
John Corbett O'Meara, United States District Judge
Before the court is Plaintiffs' motion for remand, which has been fully briefed. Pursuant to L.R. 7.1, the court did not hear oral argument, as this matter has been thoroughly and sufficiently presented in the briefs.
BACKGROUND FACTS
This case arises out of the water crisis in Flint, Michigan, in which the city's drinking water became tainted with lead and other contaminants after the city switched its drinking water source to the Flint River to reduce costs. The complaint was filed as a class action in state court by named Plaintiffs Melissa…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Watson v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hoke v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2020
- Tan Phu Cuong Investment LLC v. King CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019