Legal Opinion

Field v. Hafnia S. S. Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 12, 1916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On motion for reargument.

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

The motion is confined to the one feature of the claim for hire as affected by the suspending provision of the charter party. The cross-libelant has successfully maintained that the fire casualty which befell the vessel suspended all its obligations under the charter party.. It has been found in favor of the claimant that the suspension of the obligations of the contract continued throughout the life of the charter party. It was further found that the claim made for hire was not justified. We have been asked to review this latter ruling, and, in doing so, to make a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clyde Commercial S. S. Co. v. West India S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
  2. Lake Steam Shipping Co. v. BaconDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1904
  3. Lake Steam Shipping Co. v. BaconCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
  4. Lake Steam Shipping Co. v. BaconDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. The CanadiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API