Legal Opinion

Seal v. Seal

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 21, 1978No. 53Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant is the plaintiff in a divorce action. She contends that she should be excused from the payment of all costs in the prosecution of the action by reason of her indigency. She supports herself and her two children with public assistance payments of $294 per month. The costs of filing and service of the complaint would be $23.75. The court below found that appellant had the ability to pay this sum, and therefore entered an order requiring her to pay filing fees and sheriff’s costs, and excusing her from the payment of all other costs in prosecuting the action. We find no abuse of…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. NicholsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Moskol v. MoskolSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API