Legal Opinion

Umbarger v. Bean

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 16, 1863PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Tama District Court. Before the Board of County Supervisors the plaintiff claimed damages, in the matter of vacating and re-locating a part of what is known as the Bluff road, leading from Marengo to Kosta in said County. From the decision of said Board in the premises the plaintiff appealed to the District Court.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Tama District Court. Before the Board of County Supervisors the plaintiff claimed damages, in the matter of vacating and re-locating a part of what is known as the Bluff road, leading from Marengo to Kosta in said County. From the decision of said Board in the premises the plaintiff appealed to the District Court. From an order of said Court, overruling a motion to dismiss said appeal, because the same was not authorized by law, and if so, had not been taken within the time limited by the statute, &c., the defendants appealed to this Court, assigning for , error the overruling of…

1Opinion of the CourtLowe, J.

Under the act conforming existing laws to the change made in the' system of County government and organization, Rev., 1860, 58, we are of the opinion an appeal from the order or decision of the Board of Supervisors is authorized, and that the same was taken in time in this case. The order below, therefore, is

Affirmed.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Prosser v. Wapello CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  2. Sigafoos v. TalbotSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  3. Lippencott v. AllanderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  4. Garber v. Clayton CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  5. Lippencott v. AllanderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API