Legal Opinion

Neracker Sprinkling Co. v. Eureka Co.

Hamilton Circuit Court

Decided January 15, 1894Published

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton county.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

We are of the opinion that the motion to strike the bill of exceptions from the files should be overruled on several grounds. The action was commenced Aug. 3, 1892. The proceedings, therefore, in regard to the taking of a bill of exceptions, were governed by the statute passed March 12, 1892. Sections 5301-2, 89 O. L., 124. This gave the right to the taking and the allowance of a bill of exceptions within fifty days after the overruling of a motion for a new trial, based on the ground that the court erred in its action on a motion to direct a non-suit, or to arrest the testimony from the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. CartwrightOregon Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Capital Lumbering Co. v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API