Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bank v. Raymond

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 10, 1876Published

From Rockingham Circuit Court. Assumpsit, for goods sold and delivered, and an account annexed to the writ for hay, and interest.

Read the full summary

From Rockingham Circuit Court. Assumpsit, for goods sold and delivered, and an account annexed to the writ for hay, and interest. The cause was sent to a referee, who reported as due the plaintiffs $246.55, and the following facts: “ The hay, to recover the price of which this suit is brought, was the property of Parna Towle and J. Warren Towle, jointly; before its sale it was mortgaged by them to the plaintiffs ; it was sold by J. Warren Towle to the defendant’s agent, with the verbal authority on the part of the plaintiffs for him to find a purchaser for it. Towle had no written authority…

1Concurrence

The provisions of the Gen. Stats., ch. 123, secs. 19-21, were made for the benefit of the mortgagor, and may be waived by him. A sale of the chattels, mortgaged by the mortgagee, with the assent of the mortgagor, is just as effectual as a sale under the statute, with the formalities prescribed by law. Patrick v. Meserve, 18 N.H. 300.

It is not to be presumed that Towle was empowered to negotiate a sale, unless his efforts could be made available. For what purpose was he to find a purchaser, unless it was that when he had found one, at such price as was satisfactory to him and the mortgagees,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chandler v. CoeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1874
  2. Patrick v. MeserveSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1846

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API