Parker v. Harriman
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
McKUSICK, Chief Justice.
In this negligence action tried to a jury, the Superior Court (Waldo County) at the end of plaintiff Tony Parker’s case directed a verdict in favor of defendant Dallas Har-riman. On appeal we reject Parker’s argument that he had presented enough evidence of Harriman’s negligence to take the case to the jury, as well as his alternative contention that the principle of res ipsa loquitur was applicable to the facts of this case and eliminated the need of any other evidence of negligence. We affirm the judgment entered for defendant Harriman.
On April 29, 1983, Harriman was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Adams v. Buffalo Forge Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Chaisson v. WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
- Ginn v. Penobscot CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
- Ginn v. Penobscot CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
- Baker v. Mid Maine Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
3Cited by18 opinions
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,231 Dale Walker and Liana Walker v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Brown v. Crown Equipment Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Gayer v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Dyer v. Maine Drilling & Blasting, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- Wellington Associates, Inc. v. Capital Fire Protection Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.