Legal Opinion

Matter of SAJ

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1997No. C-96-8PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Justice.

JLJ (Mother), a non-eustodial parent of a minor child (Child), appeals the district court’s order modifying her visitation rights. We find the actions of the court, refusing parties their right to present testimony and evidence regarding issues of child visitation, violate due process. We therefore reverse.

Appellant Mother submits the following issues:

1.Did the district court abuse its discretion by denying due process in modifying the appellant’s visitation order:

A. Without allowing the appellant to present witnesses and evidence at a hearing?

B. Without providing sufficient…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Stadtfeld v. StadtfeldWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Holm v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1965
  4. White v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Goff v. GoffWyoming Supreme Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Guardianship of MeoWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  2. In Re" H" ChildrenWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. DH v. Wyoming Department of Family ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Kes v. CatWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Pena v. RodriguezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API