Legal Opinion

Tyler v. Arnold

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1882PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Van Burén. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Graves, O. J.

Tyler being a farmer and defendants in «error country traders in the same vicinity, the latter sold a ■suit of clothes to Tyler’s minor son who was about twenty years of age, and were allowed in the court below to recover of the plaintiff in error therefor. The young man directed that the goods should be charged to his father, and evidence was given for defendants in error that he represented that his father authorized him. This however he denied. The substantial facts were that he spent the most of his time away from home and received for his own use the pay for the chief part…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sassaman v. WellsMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API