Legal Opinion

City of Champaign v. Auler

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 17, 1982No. 4—82—0215PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mills

A Staffordshire terrier became entangled in a “leash law.”

The question: Is the element of knowledge or scienter required of the dog’s owner to find him in violation of this ordinance?

The answer: Yes.

We reverse.

Defendant Auler was found guilty of violating a municipal ordinance of the city of Champaign which prohibits dogs from running at large and was fined $10. He appeals from the judgment of the trial court.

Auler was charged with violating sections 6 — 6 and 6 — 19 of the Municipal Code of Champaign (1975), as amended. Section 6 — 6 provides:

“No person owning any dog *** shall suffer or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Village of Northbrook v. CannonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  2. Kinder v. GillespieIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Hansmar, Inc. v. Illinois Liquor Control CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Town of Collinsville v. ScanlandIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Case v. HallIllinois Supreme Court · 1859

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Egenreither ex rel. Egenreither v. CarterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Zebulon Enterprises, Inc. v. DuPage County, IllinoisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API