City of Champaign v. Auler
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mills
A Staffordshire terrier became entangled in a “leash law.”
The question: Is the element of knowledge or scienter required of the dog’s owner to find him in violation of this ordinance?
The answer: Yes.
We reverse.
Defendant Auler was found guilty of violating a municipal ordinance of the city of Champaign which prohibits dogs from running at large and was fined $10. He appeals from the judgment of the trial court.
Auler was charged with violating sections 6 — 6 and 6 — 19 of the Municipal Code of Champaign (1975), as amended. Section 6 — 6 provides:
“No person owning any dog *** shall suffer or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Village of Northbrook v. CannonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Kinder v. GillespieIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
- Hansmar, Inc. v. Illinois Liquor Control CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Town of Collinsville v. ScanlandIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
- Case v. HallIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Egenreither ex rel. Egenreither v. CarterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Zebulon Enterprises, Inc. v. DuPage County, IllinoisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020