Legal Opinion
Heidkamp v. Fifth Third Bank (In Re Heidkamp)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida
Decided August 26, 2005No. Bankruptcy No. 9:04-bk-22830-ALP. Adversary No. 9:05-ap-00170-ALPPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACTS, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
ALEXANDER L. PASKAY, Bankruptcy Judge.
In the above-captioned adversary proceeding, Thomas S. Heidkamp (the Debt- or) filed a one-count Complaint seeking Damages and Injunctive Relief against Fifth Third Bank (Fifth Third). The Debtor in the Complaint contends that Fifth Third -willfully violated the automatic stay, entitling the Debtor to a monetary award of actual damages suffered as a result of the violation pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(h) of the Bankruptcy Code.
In due course Fifth Third filed its Answer to the Complaint and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jove Engineering, Inc. v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Walter Burnes v. Pemco AeroplexCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Parker v. Wendy's International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- In Re HedetneimiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2003
- America Online, Inc. v. Uhrig (In Re Uhrig)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Frankel v. Strayer (In Re Frankel)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Sandra Slater v. United States Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Sandra Slater v. United States Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016