Legal Opinion

Handy v. Handy

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 15, 1922No. 3281PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

Mamie Handy brought an action against her husband, George Handy, for partition of described land, alleging that she owned a one-half undivided interest in the land and that the defendant was the owner of the other one-half interest. The defendant filed an answer denying that the plaintiff had any interest in the land, alleging that she was a stranger to the title and had never had any interest in the property; that the property was bought by him with money of his former wife, Annie Handy, and that the title to the same was taken in the name of the respondent, his former wife, deceased, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Plant v. PlantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Butt v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Singer v. First National Bank Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. McCollum v. LovelessSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Allgood v. AllgoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  4. Knight v. LoweryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  5. Bank of Graymont v. KingerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API