Roran Corp. v. Carron

SARTAIN, Judge.

This is a suit to determine a dispute between a principal contractor (plaintiff-Ro-ran) and a painting subcontractor (defendant-Carron) and the paint supplier (defendant-SCM Corporation, parent company of Glidden-Durkee). Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment. We affirm.

Defendant Carrón argues that he was acting as an agent and employee of Corporate Triangle, Inc., and is not individually responsible.

Defendant SCM contends that the paint it furnished was not substandard and the “failure” complained of was not due to any defect in its product.

The issues presented are…