Legal Opinion

Miller v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2001No. E1998-00247-SC-R11-PDPublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court,

in which E. RILEY ANDERSON, C.J., ADOLPHO A. BIRCH JR., JANICE M. HOLDER and WILLIAM M. BARKER, JJ., joined.

We granted petitioner, David Earl Miller’s application for permission to appeal to determine whether this Court’s decision in State v. Brown, 836 S.W.2d 530 (Tenn. 1992) created a new state constitutional rule regarding the elements of deliberation and premeditation. Petitioner claims that Brown created a new state constitutional rule and that the jury instructions given at his initial trial violated this rule by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Fields v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Henley v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Alley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. FaulknerTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  3. David Keen v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  4. David Miller v. Tony MaysCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  5. David Miller v. Roland ColsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API