Legal Opinion

Carlos Fonseca v. Consolidated Rail Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 4, 2001No. 00-3180PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILMAN, Circuit Judge.

Carlos Fonseca, who developed carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) as a result of his employment as a railroad laborer with Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail), sued his former employer for damages under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA). Conrail filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that the statute of limitations had run on Fonseca’s claim. The district court granted the motion, a ruling that Fonseca now challenges on appeal. For the reasons set forth below, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court and REMAND the case for further proceedings…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Proctor v. ApplegateDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
  2. Surles v. AndisonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  3. Frank Rembisz v. Jacob LewCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  4. Inge v. Rock Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  5. William S. Mix v. Delaware and Hudson Railway Company, Inc., D/B/A Cp Rail SystemCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API