Legal Opinion

Tankersley v. Davis

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 24, 1937PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

In this case appeal is from final decree in a suit the purpose of which was to procure judicial interpretation and construction of the terms of.a deed.

On March 14; 1924, J. C. Bishop, then a widower, owned in fee simple the lands involved and on that date he made a deed of conveyance of a part of said land to Mrs. Bonnie Tankersley. The habendum clause of that deed was as follows:

“To PIave and to PIold with all the rights, privileges and appurtenances thereunto belonging to the said party of the second part, for and during the term of her natural life and thereafter to any child or children…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mott v. First National Bank of St. PetersburgSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  2. Blocker v. BlockerSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. Arnold v. WellsSupreme Court of Florida · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of RentzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  2. Popp v. BondSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
  3. Lewis v. City of OrlandoSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  4. Matter of Hernando Healthcare, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1993
  5. BARRON v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API