Legal Opinion

Winstead v. Hildenbrand

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 16, 1946No. 9140PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Associate Justice.

This is an appeal from a verdict and judgment of the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia in favor of appellee, defendant below, on an action brought by appellant, plaintiff below, to recover damages for negligence and malpractice resulting in his total blindness.

Appellant suffered from syphilis, contracted prior to 1941. On October 9, 1941, he was admitted to the Georgetown Hospital Night-Clinic. From November 23, 1942, to February 1, 1943, he received seven injections of tryparsamide, an arsenical specific used in the treatment of…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Furr v. HerzmarkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  2. Lloyd B. Sharp and Calvin Edwards v. H. C. RootCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  3. Central Dispensary & Emergency Hospital, Inc. v. HarbaughCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  4. Dalon v. Golden Lanes, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  5. Furr v. HerzmarkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API