Legal Opinion

Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. Gilmore

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 1899No. 2,866PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Newton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Black, J*.

— The appellant was sued by the appellee for damages for injury and destruction of his property by fire. It was stated in the complaint that the appellant, in running its locomotive engines on its railroad, carelessly and negligently omitted to use spark-arresters or proper appliances to prevent the. emisison of sparks from said locomotives, but used spark-arresters which were worn and defective, and which contained holes through which large coals of fire and sparks were emitted, and permitted to escape, and which did escape on account of the appellant’s using said engines, the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jacksonville, Tampa & Key West Railway Co. v. Peninsular Land, Transportation & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1891
  2. Henderson v. Phila. R., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1891
  3. Gibbons v. Wisconsin Valley RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Davidson v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  5. Coale v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chicago & Erie Railroad v. BargerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railway Co. v. RossIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LoosIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LoosIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API