Legal Opinion

Clemens v. McNamee

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided June 30, 2009No. 2:08-cr-00471Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KEITH P. ELLISON, District Judge.

Before the Court are Plaintiffs Motion to Reconsider (Doc. No. 66) and Motion to Supplement Motion to Reconsider. (Doc. No. 69.) After considering the parties’ filings, all responses and replies thereto, and the applicable law, the Court finds that Plaintiffs Motion to Supplement Motion to Reconsider should be granted and his Motion to Reconsider should be denied.

I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This case arises out of Defendant’s allegedly defamatory statements regarding Plaintiffs use of performance-enhancing drugs. The Court’s previous order laid…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Edward H. Bohlin Co., Inc. v. Banning Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  2. Sherman Simon, Jr., Individually and as Next Friend of His Minor Children, Peter Darnell Simon and Keenan Simon, Etc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  3. Seiferth v. Helicopteros Atuneros, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  4. James v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Ross v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API