Legal Opinion

Lee v. Weerda

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1923No. 17668PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

— Appellants, being the owners of a farm situated in Snohomish county, leased the property in May, 1922, to the respondents, the lease providing that the property was to be used as a dairy and stock farm for the period of five years, the respondents agreeing to keep the property in good repair, to destroy all noxious weeds, pay the rent due, not to assign the lease, to pay taxes, and do other things generally provided in a lease of this kind. The lease also called for the purchase by the respondents of over *169$5,000 worth of personal property situated on the farm. On July 27, 1922, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Big Bend Land Co. v. HustonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Monroe v. StaytWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Smith v. Seattle Camp No. 69, Woodmen of the WorldWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Byrkett v. GardnerWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Decker v. VerloopWashington Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beliveau v. BeliveauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Yukon Investment Co. v. Crescent Meat Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Provident Mutual Life Insurance v. ThrowerWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Meyers v. WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Hager v. ParcherWashington Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API