Legal Opinion

Yurkas v. O'Neill

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 11, 1948No. Civ. No. 7542PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This is a motion, under rule 42(a) of Rules on Appeal, to dismiss the appeal for failure of the appellant to either pay the clerk’s estimated cost of preparing the transcript, or to make arrangements with the clerk for the payment thereof, as required by rules 4(c) and 5(c) of said Rules on Appeal. The plaintiff was represented on said motion in this court in proper person. The defendant was represented by his attorney, Peter Mannino.

Plaintiff brought the action against the defendant in Sacramento County Superior Court, for damages resulting from alleged negligence. The cause was tried April…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Barry v. BowdleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Conboy v. Sparton Scaffolding Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API