Legal Opinion
Seltsam v. Stein
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 27, 1997No. 70402PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRIMM, Judge.
This ease involves the confirmation of an arbitration award. Defendant broker appeals. We do not reach the point broker raises because his challenge to the arbitration award is untimely. We affirm.
I. Background
On April 19, 1989, plaintiff client signed what is obviously a preprinted form. The form indicates it is a contractual agreement for the purchase and sale of securities, including puts and calls.
Paragraph 24 of this contractual agreement is titled Arbitration and Litigation of Disputes. It provides that controversies “shall be submitted to and be settled by arbitration.”
*557A…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Local 2, International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio, v. Anderson Underground Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Arbitration of Pope Construction Co. v. State Highway CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1936
- Missouri Mining, Inc. v. St. Joseph Light & Power Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by3 opinions
- MBNA America Bank, N.A. v. HartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- ASSET ACCEPTANCE LLC v. SchaumannMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Freeman Contracting Co. v. Williamsburg Village Condominium Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006