Legal Opinion

Butch v. Thangamuthu

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 18, 1995No. 13263PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHennessy, J.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendants barring the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly concluded that a mechanic’s lien filed against a single lot in a subdivision is valid only with respect to services and materials furnished in the development of that lot. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The facts underlying this appeal are as follows. On August 3, 1988, the plaintiff, doing business as Butch *548& Loveland Company, entered into a contract to perform sewer and road work for an eighteen lot…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. University of Connecticut v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Pomarico v. Gary Construction, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  3. Papa v. Greenwich Green, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  4. Dewolf v. BoneeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. New England Savings Bank v. Meadow Lakes Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. New England Savings Bank v. Meadow Lakes Realty Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  3. Paulsen v. United Excavating, Inc., No. Cv 95-0374223 (Aug. 14, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
  4. Paulsen v. United Excavating, Inc., No. Cv 95-0374223 (Aug. 15, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API