Legal Opinion
Richmar Development, Inc. v. Midland Doherty Services, Ltd.
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided July 19, 1989No. C-C-88-535-PPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROBERT D. POTTER, Chief Judge.
I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Midland Doherty Services, Ltd.’s Motion to Dismiss, filed February 13, 1989, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant Midland Doherty Services, Ltd. (“Midland Doherty”) asserts in its Motion to Dismiss that Richmar Development, Inc.’s claims against Midland Doherty should be dismissed because this Court lacks personal jurisdiction over Midland Doherty — a foreign corporation. Plaintiff opposes Defendant Midland Doherty’s Motion to Dismiss and has…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- General Latex & Chemical Corp. v. Phoenix Medical Technology, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1991
- Barclays Leasing, Inc. v. National Business Systems, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1990
- Uniprop Manufactured Housing Communities Income Fund II v. Home Owners Funding Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1990
- Capstar Corp. v. Pristine Industries, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1991
- Marx Industries, Inc. v. Chestnut Ridge Foam, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.