Legal Opinion
In Re Posco
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 22, 2015No. 2015-112PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge DYK.
Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge HUGHES.
ON PETITION
DYK, Circuit Judge.
ORDER
Petitioners POSCO and its U.S. subsidiary POSCO America Corporation (collectively, “POSCO”) seek a writ of mandamus from an order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey modifying the court’s protective order to allow foreign courts access to petitioners’ proprietary information. We grant the petition.
I
On April 24, 2012, Nippon Steel & Sumi-tomo Metal Corporation (“Nippon Steel”) filed suit in the District of New Jersey, charging POSCO…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Stauffer Chemical Company, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance Company, Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Monsanto Company Reichhold Limited Fmc Corporation Bridgestone/firestone, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- John A. Pansy v. Borough of Stroudsburg Harold A. Bentzoni Kathryn Mikels John W. Osborne, II William Reber Mary Jean Knapik Maryann West Kowalshyn Richard F. Osswald Carl R. Rogers v. Ottaway Newspapers, Inc. T/a Pocono Record, Ronald F. Bouchard Pennsylvania Newspaper Publishers Association, Intervenors/appellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- AMGEN INC. v. CELLTRION USA, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2024