Legal Opinion
Gallivan v. Jones
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 14, 1900No. 578PublishedCited by 1 opinion
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error was plaintiff in the court below. The action was commenced by him in that court, upon the ground of diverge citizenship of the parties, to recover $6,525, — the alleged value of his services as physician and surgeon, rendered to the deceased, Henry C. Nelson, during his lifetime. The original complaint alleged that by the last will of the deceased, which was duly admitted to probate on November 29, 1897, by the superior court of Colusa county, Cal., the plaintiff and the defendants J. Thad Jones, J. W. Goad, and R. E. Smith were appointed executors…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Byers v. McAuleySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Hess v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Clark v. BeverSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Steamboat BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
3Cited by1 opinion
- Winder v. WinderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941