Legal Opinion

Mrs. Dagmar C. Joseph v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 21, 1965No. 21449_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant-defendant was convicted of a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2314 and prosecutes this appeal.

The court finds no merit in appellant’s contentions that she was improperly denied a continuance and a bill of particulars. Both of these matters rest within the sound discretion of the trial judge and will be reviewed only when there is clear abuse. Taylor v. United States, 279 F.2d 10 (5th Cir. 1960); Robertson v. United States, 263 F.2d 872 (5th Cir. 1959). Clearly, no such abuse is shown by the present record. In regard to the refusal to grant a continuance it is noted that the original…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Henry Pierce Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  2. Walter Weaver Robertson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. John P. Tillman, Robert Barber Moore, Johnny C. Wilson, Larry Fox, Donald P. Stone and Michael W. Simmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Timothy Leary v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  3. Gene Downing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  4. United States v. Michael Mitchell BeardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  5. Bobby Jean McKissick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API