Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago R. W. Co. v. Cahill

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1878PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Putnam Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtFiblack, J.

-This was a suit by George Cahill, against the Louisville, New Albany and Chicago Railway Company, for killing two horses at a point on the line of the defendant’s railway, at which it was not securely fenced. The defendant answered in three paragraphs:

1. The general denial;

2. That the plaintiff turned his said horses loose upon *341the streets, highways and unenclosed commons in and about the city of Greencastle, without any care or control over such horses, in violation of an ordinance, of said city, by reason of which said horses wandered and strayed upon the defendant’s railway track and were…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jeffersonville, Madison & Indianapolis Railroad v. DunlapIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Bellefontaine Railway Co. v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis-Railroad v. O'ConnorIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Knight v. Toledo & Wabash Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1865

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Welty v. Indianapolis & Vincennes RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Fort Wayne, Cincinnati & Louisville Railroad v. WoodwardIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WhitesellIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. SchaeferIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API