Logan Co., Inc. v. Cities of Am., Inc.

While I agree with the majority’s ultimate holding under the first assignment, I cannot agree with its conclusion under the second assignment that the trial court had the authority to grant the temporary restraining order against appellant. Specifically, I conclude that the court should not have granted either the order or the request for an examination of the debtor because the requests for each were not made by an attorney on behalf of appellee. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent in part.

R.C. 2333.09 sets forth the procedure by which a judgment creditor can move for an examination of the…