Legal Opinion
Keenan v. TOWN OF GATES
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided February 15, 2006No. 06 CV 6045LPublished
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Darren Keenan, appearing pro se, commenced this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, asserting a claim of malicious prosecution against the Town of Gates, New York, the Gates Police Department and Gates Police Officer Shelley Conradt. Along with the complaint, plaintiff has filed a motion to seal the entire record in this case, and for leave to proceed anonymously.
Plaintiffs motion is denied. A “presumption of immediate public access attaches [to judicial documents] under both the common law and the First Amendment.” Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of OnondagaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. AmodeoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Roe v. Aware Woman Center for Choice, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Bill W. Doe v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- City of Hartford v. ChaseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.