Legal Opinion

McElhaney v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 1, 2017No. 111590Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 111,590 EMMA MCELHANEY, Appellant, v. CHARLES THOMAS, LARRY THOMAS, SUSAN THOMAS, and STATE FARM, Appellees. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Civil battery is the unprivileged touching or striking of one person by another, done with the intent of bringing about either a contact or an apprehension of contact that is harmful or offensive. 2. An intent to injure is a necessary element of the intentional tort of battery. 3. The "intent to injure" element of a civil battery claim can be satisfied in alternative ways—either by (1) an intent to cause a harmful…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. Bowman v. DohertySupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. Gould v. Taco BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  4. Beck v. Kansas Adult AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  5. Fusaro v. First Family Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API