Legal Opinion

Doe v. Isom

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 18, 2014No. ED 99707PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROY L. RICHTER, Presiding Judge.

Col. Daniel Isom, Chief of Police for the Metropolitan Police Department, City of St. Louis, the St. Louis Circuit Attorney’s Office, and the Missouri State Highway Patrol (collectively, “Appellants”), appeal from a declaratory judgment in favor of John Doe (“Doe”), a Missouri resident, on Doe’s petition seeking removal of Doe’s name and identifying information from the federal and Missouri’s sex offender registries. We reverse and remand.

I. BACKGROUND

The facts of this case are not in dispute. In May 2008, Doe hacked into the email account of A.R., the 15…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. United States v. FeltsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. DodgeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re A.C.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Wilkerson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Doe v. BelmarMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. J.M.L. v. Missouri State Highway PatrolMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. John Doe v. Kurt Frisz, Chief Law Enforcement Officer, St. Charles County, MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API