Legal Opinion

Rucker v. Abell

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 22, 1848PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Chancery. Case 142. Error to the Meade Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Jddge SrMPSON

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Autiiough Robert Abell, the son of Samuel Abell,, sets up and relies upon a contract with his father, for the purchase of the tract of land, alledged to have been fraudulently conveyed to him, in violation of the rights of his father’s creditors, yet he introduces n© testimony to establish the existence of any such contract.. On the contrary, all the evidence in the cause, proves that the land was a gift to him by his father, and not the subject of sale for a valuable consideration.

As then his right to the land depends on a gift merely by parol,…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Howell v. EllsberrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  2. Ranson v. RansonIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Long v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1904
  4. Platt v. SchreyerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1885
  5. Bendix v. RossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API