Legal Opinion

Rowlett/2000, Ltd. v. City of Rowlett

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided August 20, 2007No. 05-06-00520-CVPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice RICHTER.

This case involves an inverse condemnation claim in which a developer contends the City of Rowlett’s denial of its rezoning applications effected an unconstitutional regulatory taking of property. The developer, Rowlett/2000, LTD., challenges the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury’s finding that it was not deprived of all economically viable use of the property. Because we conclude the City’s refusal to rezone the property does not result in a complete elimination of the property’s value and therefore does not constitute an…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. City of Sherman v. Wayne, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  2. City of Houston v. Maguire Oil Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  3. TCI West End, Inc. v. City of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
  4. LAS COLINAS OBSTETRICS-GYNECOLOGY-INFERTILITY ASSO. v. Villalba, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
  5. Millwee-Jackson Joint Venture v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API