Legal Opinion

Bingham v. Honeyman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1898PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From Multnomah: Henry E. McGinn, Judge. Action by E. W. Bingham, administrator of the estate of J. W. Guild, deceased, against Honeyman and McBride. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of J. W. Guild, now deceased, for rent alleged to be due on a written lease executed by him February 14, 1894, whereby, in consideration of an annual rental of $100, payable half-yearly, and other covenants, he leased and demised to the defendants, according to the description contained therein, “the following described strip of land: Commencing at the north line of J. W. Holman’s claim, running thence north up to the south line of Knox and Abram’s claim, thence fifty yards *131■from low tide, the full length of said claim, back from said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. House v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Holcomb v. MooneyOregon Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Dingman v. KellyIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Noyes v. StauffOregon Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. High v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Flegel v. DowlingOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Tallmadge v. HooperOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Miller v. Belvy Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
  5. Bevan v. TemplemanOregon Supreme Court · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API