Legal Opinion

Rieger v. Pennsylvania Co.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided March 2, 1940No. 1630Published

1Opinion of the Court

Gordon, Jr., P. J.,

This is a proceeding in escheat, and the case is before us on a rule by the Attorney General to dismiss the proceedings. On December 12, 1938, plaintiff was duly appointed and commissioned by the then Secretary of Revenue to act as escheator of certain allegedly escheatable funds in the hands of defendant bank. Pursuant to this authority, and in compliance with the General Escheat Act of May 2,1889, P. L. 66, and its amendments, these proceedings were instituted by appropriate petition on December 23, 1938, on which a citation was issued and served on defendant, requiring…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Edelman v. Boardman, Secretary of RevenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. United States v. SchlierholzDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1905
  3. Bank of Pennsylvania v. GriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1860
  4. Foyle v. CommonwealthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Kress House Moving Co. v. George Hogg Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API