Legal Opinion

Luciano v. Marshall

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1979No. 10902PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*277OPINION

2Per curiam

In this original proceeding, petitioner, Anthony P. Luciano, seeks a writ of mandate directing the respondent Judge to vacate a money judgment1 entered below, and to permit petitioner to proceed to trial on an amended complaint.

Petitioner also seeks an order directing respondent sheriff to return certain personal property seized pursuant to a search order entered “in pursuance of execution” of the civil judgment.

Petitioner Anthony P. Luciano commenced this action against defendants William C. and Virginia Diercks and IAMA Corporation (hereafter Diercks), seeking specific performance,…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Robert Simpson Co. v. KempnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. State v. DerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. State v. DillonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Allen v. Trueman, Judge of Second Judicial Dist.Utah Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Robinson v. RichardsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1859

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Luciano v. DiercksNevada Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API