Legal Opinion
Morton Thiokol, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 22, 1984No. 317-83LPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
This inverse condemnation case is before the court after argument on defendant’s motion for summary judgment arid plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability.
FACTS
The facts either have been stipulated or they have not been contested in accordance with RUSCC 56(e).1 Morton Thiokol, Inc. (“plaintiff”), of which Morton Salt is an unincorporated division, owns and operates a salt mine at Weeks Island, Iberia Parish, Louisiana. On October 7,1977, the Federal Energy Administration (the “FEA”), predecessor of the Department of Energy (the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Johns-Manville Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- Jarboe-Lackey Feedlots, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- Florida Rock Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- Montego Bay Imports, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
- Scope Enterprises, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.