Legal Opinion

Robert M. Brown v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 4, 1990No. 89-1586PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Per curiam

Taxpayer/petitioner Robert M. Brown is one of approximately 230 professional hockey players who, in 1975, received deficiency notices from the IRS for deductions for off-season expenses claimed in their 1972 income tax returns. In an effort to resolve these cases expeditiously, the Tax Court directed counsel and the Commissioner to designate two representative cases for litigation. 1 The outcome of the test cases would, in theory, guide the disposition, either through settlement or litigation, of both the hockey and non-hockey issues raised in the remaining cases. What was intended as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Raymond Leger, Cross-Appellant v. Drilling Well Control, Inc., Dresser Offshore Services, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  2. United States v. Henry Francis KelleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  3. Peter Stemkowski v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  4. Stemkowski v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
  5. Stemkowski v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Allmaras v. University Mechanical & Engineering Contractors, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2025
  2. Automated Pet Care Products, LLC v. PurLife Brands, Inc. d/b/a Smarty Pear, a Delaware corporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
  3. Brown v. County of SolanoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  4. Carlton 340622 v. Arizona Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  5. Carter v. PenzoneDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API